Indie Author & Social Media Bashing
reveals
The Fallacy of Game Changers
As events and ideas that affect a significant shift in
the current way of doing or thinking about something come to be known generally
as game changing, pretenders in various fields of human endeavor have arrogated
the title of game changers to themselves.
More than in other walks of life, this trend is increasingly
evident in the publishing sector and the social media. The numbers game—views
of a Youtube video, likes of a Facebook post, retweets of a tweet, and large followers of an Instagram account—has become the new standard by which one’s appeal and
success is determined, causing random stars, erroneously considered game
changers, to emerge overnight.
Courtesy of AdvicesBooks |
It brings to mind events of a few years ago when the
advent of innovative technology simplified the publishing process through cost-effective
POD—Print-on-demand—system for paperbacks and the dawn of e-books. With it, many
charlatans, interchangeably called subsidy publishers and vanity press sprouted
everywhere like fungi. Despite this ignominious phenomenon, the time had come for
self-publishing, and when it started to grab huge market shares from
traditional publishers, the latter, afraid of losing out on the chance to ‘play
God’ went to great lengths to belittle e-books and the technology that produces
them. And, along with some traditionally published authors in the ‘exclusive
club,’ they bashed those individuals and companies that did anything to enhance
self-publishing. The Authors’ Guild, under the presidency of Scott Turow for
example, disapproved, in the strongest of terms, when Amazon acquired Goodreads,
citing concerns about the creation of an internet monopoly.
As it turns out today, Amazon isn’t the ‘great evil’
it was made out to be. By putting its technology within the grasp of writers,
it has enabled an entire new group of successful self-published authors, who
take advantage of the new situation with the realization that they don’t need
publishers given the lower costs and ease of distribution. And as they say, ‘if
you can’t beat them join them,’ now traditional publishers, after pretending
for a long time that self-publishing didn’t exist, oftentimes viewing it as
means of exploitation of writers, have joined the fray, doing the same thing
they cried foul about.
In 2012, Penguin
formally entered the business of scamming inexperienced authors with the purchase
of Author Solutions, a reviled vanity
press, for $116m. Writing in the IndieReader, David Gaughran said that the
performance of Author Solutions was
so poor that the press release announcing the purchase couldn’t even tout their
own customer’s success, listing instead some self-publishing stars including E.
L. James, who didn’t used Author
Solutions to publish their work. As if that wasn’t alarming enough, Simon & Schuster opened its own
vanity press called Archway Publishing,
and hired the now Penguin-owned Author
Solutions to run it, amid allegations that they bribed writers to lie about their scamming operation. That, unfortunately, wasn’t the only disturbing behavior by a top traditional publisher. Random House too was accused of forcing unfair terms onto writers via their new digital imprints.
Essena O'Neill |
In the social media sphere, a recent event involving a
certain Instagram model, Essena O’Neill sheds more light on the fallacy of game
changers. Catapulted to fame by the selfie culture, with half a million
followers on Instagram and a quarter of a million subscribers to her Youtube
channel, O’Neill staged an online repentance that went viral but got a backlash
from former admirers who called her act a publicity stunt. After benefiting from
the synthetic world of social media stardom by posting seductive selfies, she is now
tearfully denouncing it as a hoax and a ‘dishonest and contrived’ way of viewing
beauty.
"Her problem, and that of many like her, wasn’t,
and isn’t social media but the vain manner
in which it is being used."
Built on hype and showiness, just like reality
television, the phenomenon thrives, not on substance but on Likes, Retweets, Followers and the ability to go viral. Getting caught up in its guile or being compelled
by greed to abuse oneself in an attempt to look like someone else is only part
of the idiocy that regulates the game. In real life, succumbing to peer
pressure is not considered a virtue and so it is with the selfie charade. Therefore,
playing the victim and claiming that she was lost in the ‘Celebrity construct’
isn’t exactly visionary. After basking in this wantonness for a few years,
canceling her Instagram, Facebook, and Youtube accounts and bashing social
media on the way out to follow the dictates of conscience, and calling on other
‘like-minded’ people to join her in becoming, yes you guess right, game
changers, smacks of hypocrisy.
Essena |
Her problem, and that of many like her, wasn’t, and
isn’t social media but the vain manner in which it is being used, in the same way
that modeling isn’t an evil profession but the senseless way some people abuse
themselves in order to fit in, is. But isn’t it curious that to pursue her new
role in life as a game changer, she created a website where she appeals for
financial support, relying on the power of social media to effectively bash
social media? It might have been more honorable for Essena O’Neill to quit the
game quietly.
The fallacy of game changers is equally evident in the
self-publishing industry. As indie authors are increasingly unfettered from the
exploitation of the vanity press and the hurtful rejection of trade publishers,
the need for visibility and distribution has given rise to a new wave of ‘game
changers.’ Claiming to have the interest of the indie author at heart, these egregious
benefactors offer services, including paid reviews, aimed at giving
self-published authors a high visibility in the book market. As was recently
revealed in an Amazon civil complaint filed in Seattle, there are also fraudulent
reviewers in the mix who ask Amazon vendors to send prewritten reviews, which
they post from multiple usernames and IP addresses to outwit the company’s
detection software.
“Amazon strictly prohibits any attempt to manipulate
customer reviews and expressly prohibits compensated reviews,” the complaint
stated. “Nonetheless, an unhealthy ecosystem has developed outside of Amazon to
supply reviews in exchange for payment.”
Based on the above statement, all paid-for reviews are supposedly frowned upon. But there are several reputable media outlets and industry websites that request payment from indie authors for so called professional and unbiased reviews that are generally regarded as authoritative. Some of them have a separate page dedicated to fee-based indie reviews and others claim to offer free reviews but clearly states that such can’t, however, be guaranteed as requests for expedited (read paid) reviews are high.
"Given that the self-publishing revolution is swarming
with charlatans, fairness would demand that
all paid-for reviews be treated as bogus
whether they are from powerful
review sites charging as much as $500 for
a ‘professional’ review or from a freelancer
in a free-for-all marketplace website charging $5."
Now, with competition in the book market heating up, many
online shoppers increasingly rely on customer reviews when making spending
decisions, but just how much can such reviews be trusted if they are paid for? Given
that the self-publishing revolution is swarming with charlatans, fairness would
demand that all paid-for reviews be treated as bogus whether they are from powerful
review sites charging as much as $500 for a ‘professional’ review or from a
freelancer in a free-for-all marketplace website charging $5.
Upholding such tenets of fairness will go a long way
to stop, not only fraudulent reviewers, but also certain industry gurus
(whose reviews are seen as authoritative though they are
paid for) from undermining the trust of book readers and tarnishing Amazon’s brand
because, let’s face it, in this sea of bogus
benefactors of indie authors, the real game changers, in fact, are Amazon and those book bloggers who post honest reviews (positive or negative) without collecting a dime.
No comments:
Post a Comment