Monday, November 23, 2015

The Truth About Terrorism

Political Islam And Western Hypocrisy 

A few months ago, as African migrants, fleeing conflicts in their home countries, arrived on Italy's shores, no one paid any attention when Pope Francis blamed "Merchants of Death" for their plight. And, of course, no one asked what "Merchants of Death" meant maybe because it was obvious that Pope Francis was alluding to well known key players in the world's arms racegun manufacturers as well as gun traffickersyes, the same ones who have wrecked havoc in the regions of the world with absolutely no capacity to produce weapons of modern warfare. 

Eiffel Tower, Paris   
But on 13 November, when a series of coordinated terrorist attacks, consisting of mass shootings, suicide bombings, and hostage-taking occurred in Paris and its northern suburb of Saint-Denis, the global conversation changed. And between fear and solidarity (that saw many draping their Facebook profiles in the color of the French flag), the question was asked. "Who did this and Was it preventable?" No sooner had the Islamic State (ISIS) been identified as the culprit than the French president, François Hollande declared angrily that his country was at war with ISIS and initiated airstrikes as well as try to rally international support for a possible all-out war against the terrorists. It soon emerged that a Syrian passport used by one of the attackers belonged to a Syrian refugee who had entered Europe through Greece. Was it planted by ISIS to mislead the West? Was it a false passport? Before anyone got anywhere near the truth, many called on Europe to bar the door on Syrian and Iraqi refugees. 


In the United States, many presidential candidates made their voices heard and loudly too. From Donald Trump's idea of a Muslim database to Ben Carson's comparison between Muslims and rabid dogs, to Jeb Bush's proposal for Christian refugees only, the presidential campaign was transformed into fear-mongering. 

Not everyone caught the bug. Many media outlets began to ask such questions as "Who are these terrorists that we are so afraid of and how are they funded?"  
According to the Middle East Research and Information project, “Over the last decade, the Middle East has become a focal point of the world arms buildup. Each year, the regional arsenal grows, as the United States, the Soviet Union, France, Britain and others ship billions of dollars worth of weapons to the countries there.” In August this year, the Mirror—a UK newspaper—published what it described as the scandal of Britain’s £6bn arms deals with  war-torn Middle Eastern countries which could fall to ISIS. It included, the paper said, £15 million in sales over the past five years to embattled Libya, large parts of which are already controlled by a vicious terrorist group. In Italy, the Rome-based newspaper, Il Messaggero, reported that Italian arms exports to Islamic countries are worth a whopping €2.5bn.    

Pope Francis
Former British PM, Tony Blair
When the pope lashed out at arms dealers, one online commentator, who identified himself as et cum spirit 220 on November 21, 2015 at 9:20 AM said: “He is not only evil, but truly unhinged as well. Mercy is for moslem murderers, sodomites, and adulterers, but someone who sells guns is damned. May his reign be short.” But as thousands of migrants escaping war and destitution reached Italy’s shores, the pontiff, undeterred, warned arms manufacturers, the corrupt, slave laborers and human traffickers that one day they will have to respond to God for their actions. Speaking to thousands of the faithful at the weekly general audience in St. Peter’s Square, he said: “One day everything will come to an end and they will have to account for themselves before God.”
But even Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, who invaded Iraq alongside US President George W. Bush had confessed to CNN that “there are elements of truth” in the assertion that the war (the Iraq invasion) caused the rise of the Islamic State. 

And in a video interview published on June 22, 2014, former Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton, now a candidate for the U.S. presidency, admitted that it was, in fact, the CIA that started and funded Osama Bin Laden's terrorist group, Al Qaeda. In another video testimony on the funding and arming of Al Qaeda and ISIS, published on September 20, 2014, U.S. Senators, including John McCain, said: "We've been funding ISIS all the time." On his part, Christopher Greene of AMTV reported a Wesley Clark interview on ISIS in which the General explained that ISIS was created by U.S. allies. Given the above cited testimonies, it seems a little hypocritical on the part of the West, especially the US, to decry the atrocities of terrorists that they created.

Global Research, in an online article titled: “We created Al Qaeda,” said that the protagonists of the “Global War on Terrorism” are, in fact, the terrorists. 
Citing Clinton’s successor at the State Department, John Kerry, as being in direct liaison with Al Nusru, an Al Qaeda affiliated organization in Syria, (integrated by terrorists and funded by the US and its allies), the publication said as follows:       
“The Global War on Terror (GWOT) is led by the United States. It is not directed against Al Qaeda. Quite the opposite:
The “Global War on Terrorism” uses Al Qaeda terrorists operatives as foot soldiers.
“Political Islam” and the imposition of an “Islamic State” (modeled on Qatar or Saudi Arabia) is an integral part of US foreign policy.
America is the Terror State. The GWOT is a diabolical instrument of Worldwide conquest.
It is a means to destabilizing sovereign countries and imposing 'regime change'.” 

Sydney Opera House lit up in solidarity
Now, as the world begins its campaign against the so called ISIS, it might be wise to stop for a moment and consider the hypocrisy of those leading us to war. While the pain of the Paris attacks—in which 129 people died—is a pain shared by many and the attack worth condemning, the real truth about terrorism, if considered, may bring us to the same reasoning that prevented Charlotte Farhan, a French-British woman based in Portsmouth, from draping her Facebook profile in the colors of the French flag.

Charlotte Farhan
In a Facebook post shared more than 88,000 times and 'liked' by more than 133,000 people, Ms. Farhan—managing director of non-profit group Art Saves Lives International—said: “I won’t be changing my profile to the French flag even though I am French and from Paris. The reason for this is that if I did this for only Paris it would be wrong. if I did it for every attack in the world, I'd have to change my profile everyday several times a day.”  

Sunday, November 15, 2015

The Vatican Dossier

physician, heal thyself


A gathering of cardinals
Origin: the Bible, Luke 4:23 (King James Version)

And he said unto them, Ye will surely say unto me this proverb, Physician, heal thyself: whatsoever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in thy country.” 


Some might say that the unraveling of the Roman Catholic Church began with the election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio as the 266th pope (on March 13, 2013 by 115 cardinals on the second day and fifth ballot of the cardinals’ conclave).   

That election, they might say, effectively put an end to what had been dubbed ‘Holy Silence’ on perhaps the most outlandish religious hypocrisy in the world. More than any other faith, the Roman Catholic Church, hiding behind ‘a veneer of holiness,’ has been assertive in projecting its views on world affairs, society, religion, and politics, while at the same time stifling its own scandals as if its conduct can’t and shouldn’t impact its views.   

St. Peter's Square - Vatican City
The election of the Argentine Jesuit exposed that hypocrisy. It was the first time in history that the church elected a Jesuit Pontiff, a surprise given that Jesuits have historically served popes rather than become popes. “In a sense, having a Jesuit pope is rather like having a civil servant as prime minister,” Jon Anderson wrote in the Catholic Herald magazine. It should therefore not have come as a surprise when, for the first time, a reigning pope ignored the Holy See’s security concerns and stepped across St Peter’s Square in Rome to mingle with regular folks, shook hands with stunned passersby, telephoned ordinary people at home to express his solidarity with their plight and quite compellingly, chose to simplify the extravagant papal wardrobe. In the true spirit of a Jesuit, Pope Francis ditched the ‘holier than thou’ aura that had, in all of the church’s checkered history, closeted pontiffs under a shroud of mystery like an unfathomable cocoon, and by so doing, made himself, for all intents and purposes, a common mortal. 

Pope Francis
Since his election, the pope has gone to great lengths to reform the church, telling bishops that he wanted a church that was humble and poor, and not obsessed with preaching doctrine or acquiring power. He explained that Christian doctrine wasn’t a closed or rigid system but rather one that lives and changes and develops. Speaking on November 11, in Florence, Italy, to bishops and delegates of 226 dioceses of the Italian Episcopal Conference, he said Christians shouldn’t be obsessed with power, “even when it takes the shape of a power that is useful to the social image of the church.”  

Pietro Vittorelli - ex-abbot
Montecassino Abbey
It must be one of the tragic ironies of the church that while he was giving the above exhortation, the Italian media was erupting with news of the theft of half a million €uro at Montecassino Abbey in Rome by its former abbot, Pietro Vittorelli. Appointed the 191° abbot by Pope Benedict XVI (Pope Franciss predecessor), Vittorelli, in a classical case of saying one thing and doing another, once told an Italian newspaper, We are not the owners of the goods we possess, we are only administrators. But between 2007 and 2013, according to the Italian Financial police, the former abbot, with uninhibited access to the coffers of the Montecassino abbey, connived with his brother, Massimo, to systematically steal the funds rather than administrate them.

This event was neither “the last nail in the coffin” nor was it any more heartbreaking than the rest of the mind-boggling scandals emanating from this figurative home of saint-makers—unabashed abuse of minors spanning decades, rampant pedophilia & cover-ups, internal power struggles, theft of secret documents, financial malfeasance, subtle political intrigues, corruption, excesses of prelates, alleged involvement of the Vatican Bank in money laundering for the mafia and former Nazis as well as funding priests caught up in sex abuse allegations.

The Sistine Chapel (Getty)
Given the vast wealth of the Vatican state, it might seem a little difficult for prelates not to succumb to temptations, except that, unlike lay politicians, they are religious figures who had sworn fealty to both honesty and the simple ways of life taught by Christ. Their congregation therefore should be able to take their complete disregard of materialism for granted. Ironically, the failure of prelates to overcome these temptations is matched by an eagerness to scold society about the same ills, which brings the following Bible verse to mind. 

Luke 6:41-42 41Why do you look at the speck that is in your brothers eye, 
but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? 42 Or how can you say to your 
brother, Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye, when you yourself 
do not see the log that is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log 
out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take out the speck that 
is in your brothers eye.”   

Cardinal George Pell
Many Catholic watchers believe that if prelates practiced what they preach, they’d direct the wealth of the church to the needy rather than continue accumulating same. The Vatican, according to the prefect of the secretariat for the economy, Cardinal George Pell, is so wealthy it can stumble across millions of €uros just ‘tucked away’ off of its central balance sheet. “It is important to point out that the Vatican is not broke,” Cardinal Pell wrote in an exclusive article in the Catholic Herald. “Apart from the pension fund, which needs to be strengthened for the demands on it in 15 or 20 years, the Holy See is paying its way, while possessing substantial assets and investments.” 

Inside the Apostolic Palace (Eric VandervilleGamma)
Reporting in the International Business Times, Shane Croucher, wrote, “Vatican City itself has a rich economy relative to its size. Though data is scarce, and the exact GDP figure is unknown, the CIA estimates Vatican Citys 2011 revenue to be $308m. It only has a population of 800 people, meaning its nominal GDP per capita is $365,796 – making it the richest state on the planet by this measure... And much of its assets are near impossible to value because they will never be sold off, such as its gold-laden palatial church property and priceless works of art by the likes of Michelangelo and Raphael. It also owns a global network of churches and religious buildings, many of which contain precious historical treasures, serving the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics. What we do know is that Vatican Bank, officially titled the Institute for the Works of Religion, manages €5.9bn ($7.3bn, £4.64bn) of assets on behalf of its 17,400 customers. And it manages €700m of equity which it owns. Another tidbit to emerge is that it keeps gold reserves worth over $20m with the US Federal Reserve.”

Pope's residence
In spite of this enormous wealth, the new pope has kept his focus on what should matter most to the church—faith. His simplistic lifestyle, in fact, was evident even as a cardinal in Buenos Aires, where he abandoned living quarters in the elegant archbishop’s residence for an austere room elsewhere. He has maintained the same attitude as pope, shunning the luxurious papal apartments in the Apostolic Palace in Rome and taking up residence instead in a small suite in the Domus Sanctae Marthae building adjacent to St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican City, which presently functions as a guesthouse for various clergy having business with the Holy See, and as the hotel residence of members of the College of Cardinals when they participate in a Papal Conclave to elect a new pope. 

The Pope's Renault 4L
Further, the pope gave up use of his official Mercedes-Benz known famously as Popemobile, choosing instead to travel in a 1984 Renault 4L, which was given to him as a symbolic gift of his humility by Don Renzo Zocca, an Italian priest who works with disabled people, the poor, and drug addicts in a working class neighborhood in Verona in northern Italy. So far, all attempts by the pope to convince prelates to follow his example have proved fruitless, and people are baffled that since becoming pope, he has devoted a great deal of time and energy preaching to fellow preachers almost more than to lay people. This, observers say, indicates how far away the church is from its core value. 

Cardinal Bertone

Early this year, when news emerged that Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, a former secretary of state, and for a brief period administrator of the Holy See and acting head of state, was building a luxurious penthouse for his retirement, rumors were rife that Pope Francis was furious. A newspaper report about the project said refurbishment involved merging two existing flats: one of between 300 and 400 sq meters (previously assigned to the head of the Vatican gendarmerie), and another of around 200 sq meters (belonging to a deceased prelate). A photo published by Italian gossip magazine, Chi, showed the renovation atop the Palazzo San Carlo building, a palatial home with scaffolding soaring as high as four storeys around the entire penthouse complex in contrast with the meager lifestyle the pope has been promoting.   

Penthouse of the scandal (Chi)

Though the pope has not made any specific comment about it, a sermon he delivered shortly before Easter, carping about “unctuous, sumptuous, presumptuous” clerics was interpreted by many in the press as revealing his reaction to Bertone’s project. In the past, the pope had warned against church leaders who bear the “psychology of princes,” also blasting “airport bishops” who spend more time jet-setting than tending to their flocks. In an Apostolic Exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium, to bishops, clergy, and lay faithful, he said, “God save us from a worldly church with superficial spiritual and pastoral trappings!”  

Prelates, it seems, turn a deaf ear to these exhortations. Cardinal Bertone’s palatial retirement home, dubbed “penthouse of scandal,” is not the only one causing raised eyebrows. An investigation by CNN’s DanielBurke revealed that at least 10 of the 34 active archbishops in the United States defy the Pope’s example and live in residences worth more than $1 million. 

In Germany, Bishop Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst had come under fire for his extravagant lifestyle. 
Bishop Tebartz-van Elst
Nicknamed the “Bishop of Bling,” he was suspended by the Vatican and placed under investigation after spending $43 million to renovate his residence in Limburg, Germany. Tebartz-van Elst, known as theologically conservative, denied any wrongdoing, saying that the cost of the renovation was legitimate because surrounding structures had to be protected, including the old city wall. But many people in Limburg do not approve of the bishop’s excesses. “He built his office on lies,” a Limburg resident, Patrick Dehm, was quoted by the CNN as saying. “This must come to an end. The diocese doesn’t deserve this.”

Version published by Dr. Fukushima
And now, as if the world hasn’t had enough of Vatican scandals and intrigues, a new element has entered the fray—an alleged plot to discredit the pontiff­. The shocking headline was unleashed, like lightning, on the Vatican and the world at large recently by an online newspaper, QN—Quotidiano Nazionale—Pope Francis has a brain tumor. It said the tumor was diagnosed by the world famous Japanese neurosurgeon, Takanori Fukushima, who was summoned to the Vatican.
Version published by Vatican
“It is false,” said Father Ciro Benedettini, deputy director of the Vatican press office. “It is totally unfounded.” Dr. Fukushima has also categorically denied it, saying he had met the pope only once, and not privately. In a curious twist, though, a photo he had published on his blog of that meeting, which showed him, alone, shaking hands with the pope, was quickly removed when it turned out it was photo shopped after the Vatican’s official newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, published the same photo, showing the Japanese neurosurgeon surrounded by a large crowd in St. Peter’s Square as he shook hands with the pope.

Trying to make sense of the stranger-than-fiction story, the Italian newspaper, Libero, wrote that the release of such hurtful news might have been triggered by two recent events, firstly, the bitter discord that marked the final week of the Synod on family and reform; secondly, the media attacks on the pope that was followed by a leak of a highly critical letter penned by angry cardinals to the pontiff.

Luigi Bisignani
Someone else has a different view. Luigi Bisignani, a former Italian journalist and fixer, generally regarded as a “manager of hidden powers,” said the release of the news was part of a plot by the Opus Dei to discredit the pope, suggesting that there is, in fact, an ongoing rivalry between Opus Dei and the Jesuits. “The first think they are the Jesuits of the third millennium, but the latter have the pope in their ranks.”

Bisignani’s allusion to someone with a connection to the anti-Bergoglio plot, according to an online publication, infiltrato.it, was a clear reference to Monsignor Lucio Angel Vallejo Balda, a former Jubilee Secretary of the Prefecture for Economic Affairs, with ties to Opus Dei, the “desperate moves by a former powerful Spanish monsignor from whom the Vatican even took the precaution of cutting off his service phone.”    
Monsignor Lucio Vallejo Balda

Six months ago, Bisignani, the publication said, had revealed an anonymous letter threatening Jorge Bergoglio (“St. Peter’s Square will soon be purified with your blood,”) packed with details of the engagements of the pope, the Cardinals of the Curia, and the operators and envoys of the major basilicas and sanctuaries, with “a well updated pontifical annual report.”
Will Pope Francis live long enough to save the church from itself or is it enough to call on the ‘physician to heal thyself’?  

Pope Francis poses with cardinal advisers during a meeting at the Vatican. From left: Chilean Cardinal Francisco Javier Errazuriz Ossa; Italian Bishop Marcello Semeraro, secretary to the Council of Cardinals; Indian Cardinal Oswald Gracias; German Cardinal Reinhard Marx; Pope Francis; Honduran Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga; Italian Cardinal Giuseppe Bertello; U.S. Cardinal Sean O'Malley; Australian Cardinal George Pell; and Congolese Cardinal Laurent Monsengwo Pasinya. (CNS/Reuters/L'Osservatore Romano)
  
The Argentine Jesuit, Jorge Bergoglio, who became Pope Francis

Friday, November 6, 2015

#GameChangers

Indie Author & Social Media Bashing

reveals

The Fallacy of Game Changers


  


As events and ideas that affect a significant shift in the current way of doing or thinking about something come to be known generally as game changing, pretenders in various fields of human endeavor have arrogated the title of game changers to themselves.

More than in other walks of life, this trend is increasingly evident in the publishing sector and the social media. The numbers game—views of a Youtube video, likes of a Facebook post, retweets of a tweet, and large followers of an Instagram account—has become the new standard by which one’s appeal and success is determined, causing random stars, erroneously considered game changers, to emerge overnight.

Courtesy of AdvicesBooks
It brings to mind events of a few years ago when the advent of innovative technology simplified the publishing process through cost-effective POD—Print-on-demand—system for paperbacks and the dawn of e-books. With it, many charlatans, interchangeably called subsidy publishers and vanity press sprouted everywhere like fungi. Despite this ignominious phenomenon, the time had come for self-publishing, and when it started to grab huge market shares from traditional publishers, the latter, afraid of losing out on the chance to ‘play God’ went to great lengths to belittle e-books and the technology that produces them. And, along with some traditionally published authors in the ‘exclusive club,’ they bashed those individuals and companies that did anything to enhance self-publishing. The Authors’ Guild, under the presidency of Scott Turow for example, disapproved, in the strongest of terms, when Amazon acquired Goodreads, citing concerns about the creation of an internet monopoly.

As it turns out today, Amazon isn’t the ‘great evil’ it was made out to be. By putting its technology within the grasp of writers, it has enabled an entire new group of successful self-published authors, who take advantage of the new situation with the realization that they don’t need publishers given the lower costs and ease of distribution. And as they say, ‘if you can’t beat them join them,’ now traditional publishers, after pretending for a long time that self-publishing didn’t exist, oftentimes viewing it as means of exploitation of writers, have joined the fray, doing the same thing they cried foul about.

In 2012, Penguin formally entered the business of scamming inexperienced authors with the purchase of Author Solutions, a reviled vanity press, for $116m. Writing in the IndieReader, David Gaughran said that the performance of Author Solutions was so poor that the press release announcing the purchase couldn’t even tout their own customer’s success, listing instead some self-publishing stars including E. L. James, who didn’t used Author Solutions to publish their work. As if that wasn’t alarming enough, Simon & Schuster opened its own vanity press called Archway Publishing, and hired the now Penguin-owned Author Solutions to run it, amid allegations that they bribed writers to lie about their scamming operation. That, unfortunately, wasnt the only disturbing behavior by a top traditional publisher. Random House too was accused of forcing unfair terms onto writers via their new digital imprints.

Essena O'Neill
In the social media sphere, a recent event involving a certain Instagram model, Essena O’Neill sheds more light on the fallacy of game changers. Catapulted to fame by the selfie culture, with half a million followers on Instagram and a quarter of a million subscribers to her Youtube channel, O’Neill staged an online repentance that went viral but got a backlash from former admirers who called her act a publicity stunt. After benefiting from the synthetic world of social media stardom by posting seductive selfies, she is now tearfully denouncing it as a hoax and a ‘dishonest and contrived’ way of viewing beauty.

"Her problem, and that of many like her, wasn’t, 
and isn’t social media but the vain manner 
in which it is being used."

Built on hype and showiness, just like reality television, the phenomenon thrives, not on substance but on Likes, Retweets, Followers and the ability to go viral. Getting caught up in its guile or being compelled by greed to abuse oneself in an attempt to look like someone else is only part of the idiocy that regulates the game. In real life, succumbing to peer pressure is not considered a virtue and so it is with the selfie charade. Therefore, playing the victim and claiming that she was lost in the ‘Celebrity construct’ isn’t exactly visionary. After basking in this wantonness for a few years, canceling her Instagram, Facebook, and Youtube accounts and bashing social media on the way out to follow the dictates of conscience, and calling on other ‘like-minded’ people to join her in becoming, yes you guess right, game changers, smacks of hypocrisy.

Essena
Her problem, and that of many like her, wasn’t, and isn’t social media but the vain manner in which it is being used, in the same way that modeling isn’t an evil profession but the senseless way some people abuse themselves in order to fit in, is. But isn’t it curious that to pursue her new role in life as a game changer, she created a website where she appeals for financial support, relying on the power of social media to effectively bash social media? It might have been more honorable for Essena O’Neill to quit the game quietly.

The fallacy of game changers is equally evident in the self-publishing industry. As indie authors are increasingly unfettered from the exploitation of the vanity press and the hurtful rejection of trade publishers, the need for visibility and distribution has given rise to a new wave of ‘game changers.’ Claiming to have the interest of the indie author at heart, these egregious benefactors offer services, including paid reviews, aimed at giving self-published authors a high visibility in the book market. As was recently revealed in an Amazon civil complaint filed in Seattle, there are also fraudulent reviewers in the mix who ask Amazon vendors to send prewritten reviews, which they post from multiple usernames and IP addresses to outwit the company’s detection software.

“Amazon strictly prohibits any attempt to manipulate customer reviews and expressly prohibits compensated reviews,” the complaint stated. “Nonetheless, an unhealthy ecosystem has developed outside of Amazon to supply reviews in exchange for payment.”

Based on the above statement, all paid-for reviews are supposedly frowned upon. But there are several reputable media outlets and industry websites that request payment from indie authors for so called professional and unbiased reviews that are generally regarded as authoritative. Some of them have a separate page dedicated to fee-based indie reviews and others claim to offer free reviews but clearly states that such can’t, however, be guaranteed as requests for expedited (read paid) reviews are high.

"Given that the self-publishing revolution is swarming 
with charlatans, fairness would demand that 
all paid-for reviews be treated as bogus 
whether they are from powerful 
review sites charging as much as $500 for 
a ‘professional’ review or from a freelancer 
in a free-for-all marketplace website charging $5."

Now, with competition in the book market heating up, many online shoppers increasingly rely on customer reviews when making spending decisions, but just how much can such reviews be trusted if they are paid for? Given that the self-publishing revolution is swarming with charlatans, fairness would demand that all paid-for reviews be treated as bogus whether they are from powerful review sites charging as much as $500 for a ‘professional’ review or from a freelancer in a free-for-all marketplace website charging $5.

Upholding such tenets of fairness will go a long way to stop, not only fraudulent reviewers, but also certain industry gurus (whose reviews are seen as authoritative though they are paid for) from undermining the trust of book readers and tarnishing Amazon’s brand because, let’s face it, in this sea of bogus benefactors of indie authors, the real game changers, in fact, are Amazon and those book bloggers who post honest reviews (positive or negative) without collecting a dime. 

Sunday, October 25, 2015