The Freak Show That Taunts Artistic Liberty
Until news of a possible film project about Saartjie
Baartman’s life emerged recently, the Khoisan people of South Africa seemed content to let the portrayal of the Sans’ hilarious grasp with
modernity in the 1980’s comedy hit: “The Gods
Must Be Crazy” be the only reminder of their
existence.
“Khoisan” is
a unifying name for two closely linked Southern African peoples that share
physical and putative linguistic characteristics. They are culturally distinguished
as Sans or Bushmen (who are hunter-gatherers as portrayed in the above-named film) and
the pastoral Khoikhoi (Baartman’s tribe). However, Saartjie Baartman’s life story is nowhere
near as hilarious as Nǃxau ǂToma’s comedic folly in “The Gods Must Be Crazy.”
 |
| La Belle Hottentot, a 19th century French print of Baartman |
Born with extraordinarily large buttocks in 1789 in the Gamtoos Valley of
South Africa, she was taken to London when she was barely in her 20s under
false pretences. Although the British Empire had abolished the slave trade in 1807, slavery
itself continued to thrive. Saartjie Baartman’s promoters, an enterprising Scottish doctor named Alexander Dunlop and a mixed-race entrepreneur, Hendrik Cesars, in whose household she worked, exploited her unusual physique through a series of freak shows. She was stage-named the “Hottentot Venus,” (with “hottentot” - now seen as derogatory - then being used in Dutch
to describe the Khoikhoi and San, who together make up the peoples known as the
Khoisan).
The Freak Show, a popular pastime in 19th century England, was an exhibition
of biological rarities (referred to as “freaks of nature”), featuring physically unusual humans such as giants,
dwarves, conjoined twins, and those with both male and female secondary sexual
characteristics, etc. In that prevailing climate, Saartjie Baartman, with her steatopygia (an
extreme accumulation of fat on the buttocks), was the quintessential freak show
material.
 |
| A cartoon of Baartman and Lord Grenville |
According to a BBCreport, “On stage she wore
skin-tight, flesh-colored clothing, as well as beads and feathers, and smoked a
pipe. Wealthy customers could pay for private demonstrations in their homes,
with their guests allowed to touch her.
Her arrival in England coincided with
speculation over whether Lord Grenville and his coalition of Whigs - known as
the “broad bottoms” because of Grenville’s own large behind - would
try to seize government. This was a gift for cartoonists. One creation,
entitled A Pair of Broad Bottoms, shows Grenville and Baartman
standing back-to-back, with another figure measuring their respective posterior
sizes.”
Sahistory.org noted that she was exhibited
at a venue in London’s
Piccadilly Circus. “Englishmen and women paid to see her naked body displayed
in a cage that was about a meter and a half high.”
The
treatment caught the attention of British abolitionists, who tried to rescue
her because they considered her performance indecent, insisting that she was
performing against her will. However, the case failed when it emerged in 1810
that Saartjie Baartman, although illiterate, had allegedly
signed a contract with her promoters agreeing to travel to England to take part
in shows, in the hope of gaining something—material
or otherwise—from her performance.
In 1814, following Dunlop’s death and Cesars’ return to
South Africa, Baartman
 |
| A caricature of Baartman drawn in the early 19th century |
came under the influence of a French ‘animal
exhibitor,’ S. Reaux, who took her to France, where he
exhibited her in a cage alongside baby rhinoceros, wearing only a loincloth,
and amusing onlookers who frequented the Palais-Royal. She was said to have
become a celebrity once again, drinking at the Cafe de Paris and attending
society parties. During this period, she reportedly drank and smoked heavily
and was believed to have also worked as a prostitute.
Furthermore,
she allegedly agreed to be studied and painted by a group of scientists and
artists, particularly Georges Cuvier, a professor of comparative anatomy at the
Museum of Natural History, who subjected her to a series of examinations, but she
refused to appear fully naked before them, arguing that this was beneath her
dignity.
 |
| South African and French officials pose next to a plaster cast of Baartman in Paris |
Some
accounts maintain that freak shows lost their appeal in the post-Napoleonic
France, and Baartman spent the last years of her life in poverty. She died in
1815 in Paris at the age of 26 of an undetermined inflammatory disease.
Georges Cuvier,
who
had danced with her at one of Reaux’s parties, according to a report, obtained her remains from the
local police. Dissecting it, he made a plastic cast of her body, pickled her
brain and genitals and placed them in a jar, which remained on display at the
Museum of Man in Paris for more than a century and a half. But in 2002,
following a request by the late South African president, Nelson Mandela, that the French government returned her remains for burial, Saartjie Baartman
was finally laid to rest at Hankey in the Eastern Cape Province.
 |
| Beyoncé Knowles at a concert |
Early this year, when it
emerged that American singer/actress, Beyoncé Knowles was scripting a film
about Saartjie Baartman’s life in which she planned to play the leading
character, Chief Jean Burgess of the First Indigenous
Peoples of South Africa, was not pleased. “She
(Beyoncé) lacks the basic human dignity to be worthy of writing Saartjie’s story, let alone playing the part,” the chief was quoted
as saying.
 |
| On Vogue, Italy |
It was not immediately
clear what lay behind the outrage, especially as there
was no indication that the chief had seen a draft of the script or given
details of the project, so ‘misrepresentation
of facts’ was ruled out as a reason. Also, as
there was no indication that Beyoncé’s path
and that of the Khoikhoi tribe have ever crossed, the possibility of the tribe having a beef
with the singer/actress was equally dismissed as a reason for the outrage. Chief
Jean Burgess reportedly said, “Ignoring the fact that the Khoikhoi is alive and
that Saartjie’s story would have an impact on
how we are portrayed is a mistake of great magnitude.”
Following
these comments, some observers noted that historical shame was perhaps the
reason behind the outrage. “Why Saartjie Baartman? Why not a story about an Indigenous American woman?
I can only see arrogance in her attempt to tell a story that is not hers to
tell,” the chief said further, insisting that consultation, respect, and
acknowledging the existence of the Peoples were fundamental to the story.
Commenting
on the event, Kobus Reichert, a Gamtkwa Khoisan Council member, said the tribe did
not have a problem with the movie or Beyoncé Knowles acting in it as long as
the community in the Eastern Cape, where Baartman was born, was not sidelined. The
film, according to him, has to be done respectfully and with the right ‘cultural understanding’.
 |
| Illustrations de Histoire naturelle des mammifères |
While Reichert’s position is considered rational, some in the industry insist that it is unfair for historical shame to stifle artistic freedom, explaining that, in any case, no cinematographic portrayal of that event could possibly be more demeaning than the
reality of what Saartjie Baartman was
subjected to.
Meanwhile, Beyoncé has
reportedly denied that she was pursuing a movie project about the life of Saartjie Baartman (seen today by many as the
epitome of colonial exploitation and racism, of the ridicule and commodification of black people). Her
representative was however quoted as saying, “This is an important story that
should be told.”
 |
| The 2002 re-interment of Baartman's remains in South Africa |
The chairman
of the South African Guild of Actors, Jack Devnarain, responding to a question
about the matter, said, “As a producer, you
have the right to tell the stories of people you find fascinating and that’s
what we must be careful not to object to. For me, the main concern is: are we
doing justice to the person. Are we taking a careful and conscious look at what
Saartjie Baartman’s story was all
about and will that be served?” He added however, “I’m not particularly
convinced that Beyoncé is that right actor for that particular role.”
#8March - #IWD2016 - #PledgeForParity
International Women's Day (IWD) has been observed since in the early 1900's - a time of great expansion and turbulence in the industrialized world that saw booming population growth and the rise of radical ideologies. International Women's Day is a collective day of global celebration and a call for gender parity. No one government, NGO, charity, corporation, academic institution, women's network or media hub is solely responsible for International Women's Day. Many organizations declare an annual IWD theme that supports their specific agenda or cause, and some of these are adopted more widely with relevance than others.
“A lot of people are afraid to say what they want. That’s why they don’t get what they want.” – Madonna
